Jay Michaelson John Locke said, three centuries ago, that there are different kinds of decisions we make in our lives, and different criteria we should apply to each. If believing that you are the Messiah is purely an internal matter, and has no impact on others, then Locke says, you are entitled to act on that belief without much skepticism, if you like. However, if you are going to act in a way that affects others, you should only act publicly regarding that of which you are certain, and which can be externally proven. This accords with the contemplative path as well. Our personal religious enthusiasm, our mysticism - we may be certain of these, but what do they mandate of us other than love? It is when religion becomes attached to myth - whose details we can only be certain of through an leap of personal faith, i.e., not verifiable, not externally provable - that other mandates are created. Those are precisely the mandates which, says Locke, must be strictly examined and made to conform with reason. No one died as a result of mysticism. People die when mysticism is married to myth, religion, and power, without ample compassion, wisdom and skill to counterbalance them. We may feel most certain when we are angry, inflamed by violent imagery. But that is precisely the worst time to act. In fact, it is precisely the time to question. Therefore, it is neither skillful, nor wise, nor compassionate to invite people into a movie theater and broil up their passions in the context of a myth with living enemies. If anything, it is irresponsible. Let go of doubt when you are dancing, praying, or painting. Invite it back in when you are thinking of harming another - or inflaming his passions with a heartfelt but deeply disturbed vision of Divine sacrifice. I feel the power of Christ myself, although I do not generally express it in those mythical terms. I feel the presence of forgiveness in my own life, and understand how it is possible for a perfectly enlightened being to be the Son of God. It is, in a way, a beautiful myth, and I was inspired by its rendition in The Passion. But because that power of Christ, the power of the One, is married to a myth of violence, and a myth with venal enemies of whom I myself am one, I fear the film much more than I love it. It is as if a great inspiration and also a great evil has been simultaneously unleashed on the world. Gibson's often brilliant film illustrates much of what is beautiful about religion, and much of what is terrible about it. The radiance, healing, and love that are born of mysticism, and also the violence and the hatred that spring from it, nourished by it, when that energy becomes attached to a fixed and fundamentalist myth. And most of all, the power, the strength, the source of the ecstasy and of the evil: passion.
Notes from and after retreat
Between contemplation and affirmation
Bernard Henri-Levy on the death of Daniel Pearl
June, 2003
Dick Cheney and the New Age
...and what to do about it
CBS's packaging of the '9/11' documentary reveals exactly what America
fails to understand about September 11.
What draws protesters to banal holocaust art?
With stories today about space aliens and the power of prayer, what are
the limits of your enlightened skepticism?
|
Passion and Violence Jay Michaelson A Song of Ascents: The News from San Francisco Sarah Lefton Bush the Exception Samuel Hayim Brody The Wrong Half Margaret Mackenzie Schwartz God Had a Controlling Interest Hal Sirowitz Schneiderman Eliezer Sobel Josh hosts a party Josh Ring Archive Our 450 Back Pages Saddies David Stromberg Zeek in Print Winter 2003-2004 issue now on sale! About Zeek News & Events Contact Us Tech Support Links
From previous issues: Eminem & Class Rage Dan Friedman
yom kippur
Angel-Man
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|