| Douglas Rushkoff So can’t the Left put its enlightenment principles to one side and sell a spiritual Leftism to get into office before turning around, as the Bush team has, and playing as it likes with the branches of secular government? Wouldn't it be better to develop a more benevolent religious narrative than the triumphalism currently passing for foreign policy? Don’t the ends justify the means? 
Alas, no. Progressives can't pursue their values by abandoning them.  
The Right had only to adopt a few fundamentalist moralisms so that the
 neocons could grow their wealth while the Christian Right stops gays
 and abortionists.  But the Left would have to contradict its very premises.
  Instead, Progressives must come to acknowledge and bolster the faith 
 Progressives simply can't have it both ways. To peddle their agenda in a faux-religious package, without any real faith in its underlying premise, would be to install a regime even more cynically devoid of spirit than the one they mean to replace.   Reality and rhetoric in an election year October, 2004 
 
 
Douglas Rushkoff talks with Zeek about the future of Judaism
 
A review of Douglas Rushkoff's Nothing Sacred
 
A 'lapsed Jew' responds to Nothing Sacred
 
 
 
 
The best guarantor of democracy is subversive, oppositional 
counterculture.
 
 |    Let them Eat Myth Douglas Rushkoff Hipster Antisemitism Jennifer Blowdryer and Alvin Orloff To Ohio and Back Avi Steinberg The Knowing Jay Michaelson Abba Kovner: The Warrior in Old Age James Russell Men who Laughed Ari Belenkiy Archive Our 610 Back Pages Zeek in Print Fall/Winter 2004 issue now on sale About Zeek Mailing List Contact Us Subscribe Tech Support Links 
 From previous issues: 
Lag B'Omer: Sound and Vision 
 
Josh Almost Gets Cancer
Josh Ring
 
Angel-Man 
 
 | |||||||
|  | ||||||||
|  | ||||||||