Joel N. Shurkin
Are the Ten Commandments Really Carved in Stone?, p. 3



Another reason traditional Jews de-emphasize the Ten Commandments is that the ten are considered just 10 of the 613 mitzvot that bind Jews. "Within Judaism, the normative thrust is that all mitzvot are equal. Are the 10 commandments more important than others? Rabbinic tradition says no," according to orthodox Rabbi Gavriel Newman. While in most synagogues, congregants stand when the Ten Commandments are read in the Torah, the practice in some Orthodox synagogues is to sit, a deliberate act, the echo of the ancient dispute with the Christians.

"You stand for the Ten Commandments -- and the Song of the Sea -- not because they are more important than other pieces, but to replicate the experience," says Arian, formally a pulpit rabbi at a Conservative synagogue in York, Pa. "They didn't sit down to cross the Reed Sea, they walked. They stood at Sinai. One bit of the Torah is not more important than the others."

Finally, not only are the numbering and significance of the Decalogue a matter of dispute; its content is unclear as well. There are, of course, two versions of the Decalogue in the Torah, one beginning with Exodus 20:2 and the other with Deuteronomy 5:6. These versions differ in important respects, the most well-known of which regards the Fourth Commandment. In the Exodus version, the word zachor (remember) is used ("Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy.") In Deuteronomy, the word shamor (safeguard) is substituted ("Observe the Shabbat day and keep it holy.") Such differences, to those who believe the Torah to be written by humans and assembled from multiple texts, are clear proof that the Ten Commandments are not the "word(s) of God." To traditionalists, God can recite multiple words simultaneously, and thus there are no inconsistencies. Alternatively, since the recitation in Deuteronomy was part of Moses' speech to the Israelites before his death, some commentators suggest that Moses wanted to editorialize a bit. Homiletical interpretations abound -- for example, that God wanted to make sure the Israelites understood that there are both normative and restrictive aspects to the Sabbath laws -- but the ambiguity remains.

Granite and Irony

Roy Moore sought, in two-ton granite symbols, a symbol of unchanging truth and bedrock principles which undergird his America. Yet in fact the two tablets contain within them a complicated, contentious, and ambiguous text. Ironically, the tablets of Moore's Law may well be an apt and unintended symbol for what democratic judicial review, like Biblical interpretation, is meant to be about: wrestling with uncertain meaning, understanding text in the context of lived experience. They may not, indeed, be carved in stone.

Indeed, for many, the chief significance of the Ten Commandments is not in their content but in Sinai's status a revelatory moment. Says Rabbi Newman, "it is not so much the Ten Commandments, as it is the representation of the revelation, the expression of God's desire that we adhere to the Divine." So contrary to Moore's presumed reading, Sinai is a moment of imperative, not dogmatism: the two tablets stand as a challenge to sort out what a life of Divine significance would be.



[1]       [2]       3
Image: Moses Receiving the Ten Commandments, in Reuben Machsor mechol haschana (Jewish Holy Day Prayer Book for the Whole Year) Germany, ca. 1290, leaves 59b, 50a Vellum (2) (in the Saxon State Library)

Joel N. Shurkin is the author of numerous books and articles, including Am I Crazy or is my Shrink: Finding the Help I Need (1998). He won the Pulitzer Prize in 1979 for his coverage of Three Mile Island.

Related articles:

The Sacred and the Profane Douglas Rushkoff and Jay Michaelson
Douglas Rushkoff talks with Zeek about the future of Judaism
July, 2003

Reinventing the Wheel Michael Shurkin
A review of Douglas Rushkoff's Nothing Sacred
July, 2003

The Gifts of the German Jews Michael Shurkin
Toward a postmodern Judaism
August, 2003

I hear America Bling-blinging Jay Michaelson
Hypercapitalism as Satanism
June, 2003

The Red-Green Alliance Dave Hyde
The weird and worrying links between the radical Left and the Islamist Right
April, 2003

Constriction Jay Michaelson
Dick Cheney and the New Age
March, 2003

Holocaust Video Testimonies Dan Friedman
The other reality TV
August, 2003

War and Not-War Dan Friedman
The ambiguities of art and life
March, 2003

The Other Rally Samuel Hayim Brody
Confrontation and cooperation in the face of odious leaders
February, 2003

Some things have changed, some have stayed the same Jay Michaelson
Alienated politics in an age of ignorance
December, 2002

Manufacturing Dissent Chad Beck
For the Left's voice to be heard, it needs to play by the rules
November, 2002

McDonald's: A Better Opiate for the Masses? Jay Michaelson
If crass capitalism stops us from killing each other, is it such a bad thing after all?
October, 2001

Zeek
Zeek
December 2003


"We are Seriously Concerned
About the Fate of
the State of Israel"

An interview with four former Israeli Intelligence Directors



Are the Ten
Commandments
Carved in Stone?

Joel Shurkin



Run Like the Wind
Dan Friedman &
Jay Michaelson



Erev
Temima Fruchter



Fleeing Edges
Noam Mor



Josh Goes to Services
Josh Ring



Archive
Our 400 Back Pages


Saddies
David Stromberg



Zeek in Print
Fall 03 issue now on sale



About Zeek

Events

Contact Us

Links

 

From previous issues:

Strasbourg Cathedral Michael Shurkin

Skepticism Does Not Exist
Jay Michaelson

Far from Heaven: Excavating Paradise
Peter Conklin and Dan Friedman